全部文章0

Hacker Newsthisislife2··访问 1

IRGC claims it destroyed Amazon's Bahrain data center

原网页

Article URL: https://houseofsaud.com/irgc-claims-destroyed-amazon-bahrain-data-center/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49033240

Points: 331

# Comments: 432

Hacker News 讨论

331 points · 435 comments · 查看原帖

  1. andyjohnson0

    Related: Ukraine have been targeting [1] warehouses owned by Wildberries, the Russian domestic equivalent of Amazon, causing $2.2bn of damage to-date. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/24/ukraine-wareho...

  2. dhx

    AWS's 3 data centres in me-south-1 are: BAH53 (Manama): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492345589 An adjoining substation to BAH53 had one of it's two main buildings damaged/destroyed about 2026-07-16 per https://soaratlas.com/maps/asia-damage-to-data-center-power-substation-bahrain-jul-16th-2026-142024 Then about 2026-07-22 BAH53 itself was damaged/destroyed per https://soaratlas.com/maps/asia-damage-to-amazon-web-services-bahrain-jul-22nd-2026-142112 Possibly the least defended of the three sites as there is no air/missile defence battery in between this site and Iran. BAH54 (Zallaq): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359931661 No media reports about this data centre being attacked previously. Possibly the safest of the three as there are at least two (probably three) air/missile defence batteries in between this site and Iran. BAH55 (Hamala): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9560

  3. weinzierl

    Isn't an AWS region comprised of at least three data centers "many kilometers apart" [1]? So, if the whole of me-south-1 (Bahrain) went down it means at least three buildings many kilometers apart must have been attacked. [1] https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/global-infrastructure/regio...

  4. CrzyLngPwd

    American agression winning silly prizes.

  5. Neil44

    Shows unavailable, last status update 30th April https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

  6. rootsudo

    1. Wow this is a headline. 2. It’s expected and war, and while war is not good, I wonder about data backups and succession planning for this. 3. It makes sense they would’ve had a fire drill and reviewed since it’s a capital investment, 6 months of war, at the same time Bahrain is considered stable, so I really wonder about the conversation around this and if there was any disaster planning with this scenario in mind. 4. If there wasn’t, I’m sure there is now across all regions of AWS. This month has been for me, a uptick in unique headlines that I wouldn’t have thought would happen.

  7. throwaw12

    I feel for both, people who where hosting there not expecting this war and this attack and the attackers, because they didn't attack just because they wanted but attacked as a response as stated earlier. Winner: US military industrial complex + Israel Losers: Everyone else

  8. pseingatl

    My colleague in Dubai says that ATM's are all working so the claim that bank infrastructure is down may not be correct.