全部文章0

Hacker Newsksec··访问 1

Passkeys were invented by engineers with zero understanding of consumer brain

原网页

https://xcancel.com/nikitabier/status/2079787406300266743


Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49007374

Points: 526

# Comments: 726

Hacker News 讨论

526 points · 726 comments · 查看原帖

  1. gortok

    I do not know how to use a Passkey in a way that won’t impede how I log in to systems. I’ve been in tech for 26 years, and I understand the Public/private key behind what a Passkey is. Here’s what I don’t understand: I access a website through at least four different devices (my iPad, iPhone, Windows Desktop computer, and MacBook Pro) and three different browsers on each device (Brave, Firefox, Safari) , and I use LastPass. If I accidentally set up a passkey on my phone (let’s say I use Safari one day instead of my go-to, Brave), can I still log in without that passkey on other devices? Is there a way to ensure that passkey can be used on other devices? Can I add another passkey on another device? How many passkeys can I set up for a particular site/app? I have at least 6 different combination of browser/devices in use. I don’t want to use Passkeys because I don’t the answers to those qu

  2. tossitawayplz

    The first time I got asked by a site if I wanted to use a passkey I immediately googled what they were and... never really found the answer, not in the 5mins I devoted to being distracting from my task at hand anyway. "magic fairy dust to login to apps." is the most accurate description I've seen. Unlike a password or a TOTP token, I know how those work, I know its my responsibility to keep track of them. If my passkey is on my phone what happens if I lose my phone? Do I need a unique passkey per device? How do I rotate them? What if a device gets stolen? I'm so glad I'm not alone in thinking these are so poorly explained.

  3. christina97

    It’s quite the opposite. Passkeys are phenomenal for a lot of consumers. Based on this thread, it’s the engineers who understand authentication in the first place and have their own system (eg password manager) that are confused. Consider a user in the Apple ecosystem: you are already conditioned to just do Touch ID or Face ID when asked. I was on Amazon the other day, it prompted randomly for “want to set up a passkey to sign in easier”? I set it up and now I can easily sign in to Amazon on my mac or iphone with zero friction. For the normal consumer this is not a replacement for “dig out my password manager and copy-paste/autofill my password”, it’s a replacement for “oh it’s prompting for my password again” -> proceed to type your shared password for all sites.

  4. programmertote

    Like some folks already commented here, even as someone who has been working in tech for 20+ years, I find Passkey confusing. I understand the key aspect in computer science term, but I don't know how to use it across devices. Another big worry is that if I tie that to a physical key, then I might lose it (because it's physical) and never get it back.

  5. rsyring

    FWIW: I find passkeys to be a very simple and easy to use concept. Simple: it's like a password that I don't have to type in Easy to use: because I use 1Password and just have it installed on everything. On Android, it can be set as the default passkey provider so, even on mobile, I am using passkeys shared across devices. Is this "less secure" because I'm sharing the keys through 1Password. I suppose, at some level. But before that, I was simply sharing passwords through 1Password in the exact same way. So, I don't think my security posture has changed any. What has changed is the UX and IMO for the better. Now I don't have to generate/fill/copy-paste text strings for user names or passwords. 1Password knows what site I'm on and usually responds automatically when I'm in a passkey context. If I have more than one passkey available, because I have multiple accounts (for something like Go

  6. rldjbpin

    personally it works well for me as a way to login . however, lately the anti-bot/spam shenanigans from big tech has ruined any ux work they have spent trillions on. <rant> one fine day, i was trying to log into my google account at google's office . for some reason their internal wifi was serving the internet through a corporate vpn, which was based out of the US. this tripped their security system, which then made me jump 3-4 hoops to log in back to my account. i recall sms verification (where you send them a code), some part where i had to scan a qr code and open on my phone (not logged into google btw), and the usual 2fa, among others. likewise ticketmaster asking for verification for a decently used account over the years out of the blue. this is when booking a new ticket from a residential internet without any shady business. was made to reset my password three times in a row, and s

  7. exabrial

    With physical U2F key, I could explain to my 78 year-old-parents "this is a physical key needed to access your account. Think of it like the front door key to your house. Don't lose it or lend it to anyone. We should have a couple of backup keys too." And they got completely understood and added it to all of their accounts. This was not hard. People assumed consumers were too stupid to do this without even giving them a chance.

  8. 66fm472tjy7

    It seems to me like those who like passkeys/consider them simple are those who entrust all their credentials to proprietary cloud software vendors that sync them to all their devices. Those of us who are not comfortable with that and want to keep our credentials offline and sync/backup them ourselves have questions about how the registration/backup/sharing flows work exactly. I see this as part of a trend together with remote attestation, age verification, CSAM scanning, restricting sideloading, etc that will lead to most interactions over the internet only being allowed if big tech and/or government can verify the participants, the contents, and the hardware and software used. Even among techies, many support these developments, so it is just a matter of time before we have no choice but to join the former group.