全部文章0

Hacker NewsStratoscope··访问 1

The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes

原网页

Article URL: https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/meta-social-media-teenagers-22337724.php

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48897104

Points: 119

# Comments: 192

Hacker News 讨论

119 points · 192 comments · 查看原帖

  1. ticulatedspline

    Curious as to where the line between “addictive feature” and "good UX" is. Is deliberate pagination actual impedance to use or merely an annoyance that's been weeded out with modern UX design? When does a feature that simply makes your product easier to use cross into a territory that it's illegal? What about media previews, in a platform like reddit if you can preview or expand media directly from the main list is that an “addictive feature” or just convenient design? also interested in the larger economy, if you create a plugin that restores or adds infinite scroll to a website could you be liable for providing illegal UX? EDIT: to clarify I'm not really griping on infinite scroll in particular, more the difficulty in regulating postitive UI/UX. Dark patterns are relatively easy to identify. If the unsubscribe button is hidden behind 3 screens and is in 3 point font that's pretty clear

  2. scoofy

    We can all agree that the internet was great and now it is less great, but the second someone articulates a very, very simple rule, the "well ackchyually" crew comes out of the woodwork. Infinite scroll is very obviously unnecessary. It is very obviously intended to keep people on an app longer than they would otherwise use it. You can lazy load into a finite scroll. Just make people click something every once in a while.

  3. ulrikrasmussen

    Instead of trying to whack a mole on all addictive mechanisms, just ban the business model driving all of them: targeted advertising.

  4. manoweb

    This is exactly why I force my kids to always create accounts as 30-years old (by specifying a birth data in the 90s), to avoid as much State interference as possible. Did you know that if your child has a "kid" account you cannot follow him on google maps? We had to make one for "adults" in order to be able to do so.

  5. senorcrab

    It should just be universally required to give an option to disable addictive features. Should prevent age verification, and giving users optionality is always a good thing (for them).

  6. pinkmuffinere

    As somebody with not-enough self control, I would love this for myself. Self-locks help, but the temptation is always there.

  7. Varelion

    Thank God. We need more legislation against the cognitive poisoning of two generations.

  8. anderber

    I think the most frustrating thing for me is when a website has infinite scroll, but also a footer with links that you want to access. I end up going to the dev tools to look at the code.